Fears of AI cheating in hiring ‘overblown’, new research finds

Image credit: Clevry

Editorial Brief
At a glance: AI-assisted overview, optimised for journalists, search & news aggregators

New research from Clevry indicates that concerns about AI-driven cheating in recruitment are exaggerated, with only 26% of HR professionals having witnessed evidence of such cheating despite 62% believing it occurs. The study suggests that the fear is more perception-based and that the actual prevalence of AI-enabled cheating is low. It recommends improving assessment design to manage risks, noting that AI skills are increasingly valuable in the workplace.

Press Release

HR and talent professionals are overestimating the scale of AI-driven cheating in recruitment, according to new research from talent solutions provider Clevry.

While 62% believe candidates are using AI to cheat, only 26% say they have seen evidence of candidates manipulating assessment results.

Alan Redman, chief science officer at Clevry, said the concern is being driven more by perception than reality.

Dr Redman, a work and organisational psychologist, said: “There’s a growing perception that AI is fuelling widespread cheating in recruitment, but the reality is far less dramatic. The concern is being driven more by anxiety than actual evidence.

The industry’s fear of AI-enabled cheating is out of proportion to what’s actually happening. Most of the data we’ve seen suggests prevalence is relatively low, certainly far lower than people assume.

“Cheating in recruitment isn’t new. AI is just the latest tool people might use, much like asking a friend for help in the past.”

The State of AI in Talent Assessments 2026 report suggests the risk can be managed through better assessment design and simple deterrents, with some formats far harder to manipulate than others.

Dr Redman added: “Getting a job has always been an arms race. As new tools emerge, people will try to use them, but assessment methods evolve just as quickly to keep pace.

“There is an irony here as the same tools candidates might use to ‘game’ the process are often the skills employers are actively looking for.

“Being able to use AI effectively, for example structuring information or writing strong prompts, is increasingly a valuable workplace skill and not necessarily something to penalise.”

Claudia Nuttgens global head of assessment and selection consulting at AMS said: “We know that some assessment approaches are more susceptible to candidate use of ChatGPT than others and are working with clients to think about how you deter, spot and prevent ChatGPt use where appropriate.

“To some extent we are also exploring how you allow for candidate use of ChatGPT in new approaches to assessments as using AI is going to become a huge component of many people’s working lives.”

For more information please visit: www.clevry.com

For the full report please visit: https://www.clevry.com/en/the-state-of-ai-in-talent-assessments/

Notes to editors

For further information, please contact: Emily Abreu, Samantha Clark or Flo Powell Midnight Communications [email protected] 01273 666 200 Methodology The report surveyed 382 HR and talent professionals based in the United Kingdom (183) and the United States (199) and was conducted between December 2025 and January 2026. About Clevry Clevry is a talent solutions provider combining data-driven insight with human expertise to help organisations hire, develop and retain high-performing teams. Using its proprietary assessment methodology, Clevry focuses on potential as well as experience, enabling better hiring decisions and long-term performance. The company supports organisations globally with services including recruitment, talent assessment and organisational development. For more information please visit: www.clevry.com

Get more news like this

Get more news like this on Google. Set News By Wire as a ‘Preferred News Source’ to get quicker access to news that’s important.

All done!
Thank you for subscribing.

Email Subscription