Report exposes postcode lottery in head and neck cancer care, says Get A-Head

Image credit: Get A-Head

Editorial Brief
At a glance: AI-assisted overview, optimised for journalists, search & news aggregators

A report funded by the charity Get A-Head reveals significant disparities in head and neck cancer care across England, linked to geography and deprivation. The study highlights that diagnosis and treatment delays are more common in deprived areas, leading to worse outcomes for patients. Get A-Head and its partners are urging the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership to commission a national audit to address these inequalities and improve care consistency.

EDITORIAL INSIGHT: Context, industry insight and market perspectives of this news story

The interim findings from the National Head and Neck Cancer Audit feasibility study highlight persistent disparities in cancer care across England, with diagnosis and treatment outcomes varying significantly by region and level of deprivation. For healthcare providers and policymakers, the data reinforces concerns about unequal access to timely diagnosis and effective care, especially in more deprived communities where survival rates are notably lower.

Calls for a new national audit reflect a wider push in the NHS and among patient groups for improved data-driven oversight, following a decade without a dedicated programme for head and neck cancers. The evidence presented in the study may add weight to ongoing discussions about resource allocation and the need for targeted interventions to address regional and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer services.

Story Ideas
Politics/policy

Call for national audit on head and neck cancer care amid alarming statistics

Following concerning findings on head and neck cancer care disparities, Get A-Head and its coalition partners are urging the HQIP to commission a comprehensive national audit. This audit aims to standardise care across regions and improve patient outcomes.

Target audience
health policy publications, national health correspondents, political journals
Story potential
9/10
Regional impact

Regional disparities in head and neck cancer outcomes in England

The report highlights significant disparities in head and neck cancer diagnosis and outcomes across different regions in England, with Cheshire and Merseyside having the highest incidence rates. This raises questions about regional healthcare provisions and the role of local NHS services in addressing these inequalities.

Target audience
regional health reporters, local newspapers, public health outlets
Story potential
7/10
Press Release

Head and neck cancer patients face a postcode lottery in care across England with major inequalities in the time taken to diagnose disease, a leading national charity says.

Get A-Head, which helped fund research into cases of the disease across the country, says a landmark feasibility study shows inequalities in head and neck cancer diagnosis, treatment and care linked to deprivation and geography.

Cheshire and Merseyside has the country’s highest rate of the cancers at 19.21 cases for every 100,000 people, while North East London records the lowest rate at 15.25.

Meanwhile Surrey and Sussex recorded the highest rate of advanced cancers – those diagnosed at stage 3-4 – at 12.98 per 100,000 against a national low of 10.65 in the East of England.

The research also shows men are more than twice as likely to be affected and that people in the least deprived areas of the country had a much lower chance of cancer than those in the most deprived areas.

Get A-Head says the figures, revealed in the National Head and Neck Cancer Audit (NaHaNCA) Feasibility Study interim report, demonstrate the need for a national audit to improve diagnosis across the country.

The charity, founded in Birmingham more than 30 years ago, helped fund the feasibility study with a £40,000 grant as part of a total £270,000 investment over two years.

Get A-Head director Danni Heath said the interim report was a major step towards establishing a new national clinical audit – something they and other charities in the sector have been calling for since the previous programme, DAHNO, was discontinued over a decade ago.

She said: “This is a landmark moment. For the first time in over a decade, we have robust national data shining a light on the realities facing patients across England. The initial findings are deeply concerning but they are exactly the evidence we need to drive real change.”

Head and neck cancer is the fifth most common cancer in men and the seventh most common overall in the UK.

The interim report drew on national cancer registration data and NHS datasets covering more than 52,000 adults diagnosed between 2014 and 2020.

According to the report, more than 63 per cent of patients are being diagnosed with stage 3–4 disease, meaning treatment is more complex and survival chances are lower. In more deprived communities, the picture is worse still.

People in less deprived areas have a 42 per cent lower chance of developing head and neck cancer and a 48 per cent lower chance of being diagnosed at stage 3–4. In the most deprived areas, survival rates drop below 50 per cent after five years.

Treatment delays compound the problem. Just 48 per cent of oncology patients are treated within 62 days. One in five wait more than 90 days from referral to treatment.

“These figures lay bare the consequences of ignoring the health needs of people in our most deprived communities,” said Danni.

“People are being diagnosed later, waiting longer and facing worse outcomes due to their circumstances. That is simply unacceptable.”

Get A-Head is a key partner in the Head and Neck Cancer Coalition UK, which brought together perspectives from its 16 member organisations to help shape the direction of the study and ensure findings reflected real-world patient experiences.

The charity, along with its coalition partners, is now calling on the Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) to commission a full national audit for head and neck cancers to make care in England better, fairer and more consistent.

The feasibility study runs until March 2027. Its next phase will examine differences in care between NHS hospitals, adjust results to make fair comparisons between hospitals and patient groups, identify where care has the most room for improvement and explore whether rarer types of head and neck cancer could also be included.

“Our funding was instrumental in getting this study off the ground,” said Danni. “But this cannot be the end of the journey. We need HQIP to step up and commission a full national audit. Too many people, particularly those from our most deprived communities are having their health needs ignored.

“A national audit will help ensure that every person with head and neck cancer receives the care they deserve.”

Get A-Head raised more than £220,000 in 2024–25 and distributed over £194,000 in grants to accelerate research, improve treatment pathways and enhance patient support.

Funding this study aligns with Get A-Head’s commitment to improving national data collection for people with head and neck cancer and fighting inequalities in treatment provision and outcomes.

Get more news like this

Get more news like this on Google. Set News By Wire as a ‘Preferred News Source’ to get quicker access to news that’s important.

All done!
Thank you for subscribing.

Email Subscription